The documents
Every link below goes to the court or agency that published it. This site does not host copies: the publisher's copy is the authoritative one, and it should stay the one people read.
Documents this record is missing
Named openly, because a gap the reader cannot see is a gap the reader cannot weigh.
- The SC101805 contempt / enforcement motionNeeded: Actual PDF, docket timestamp, exact relief requested, exhibits, any response by the Secretary or the State, and any Missouri Supreme Court order or hearing notice.Why: AP reports it was filed Tuesday night. The site must not rely on AP once the filing is available.
- The September 8 directive to local election authoritiesNeeded: Email, memorandum or directive; timestamp; recipients; exact wording; attachments; whether issued before or after notice of appeal; whether later modified.Why: AP reports the Secretary immediately told local officials they were required to use HB 1.
- The Eighth Circuit docketNeeded: Appellate case number, notice of appeal, emergency stay application, responses, any administrative stay, panel assignment if public, orders, and treatment of 28 U.S.C. § 2284.Why: This is the track most likely to change the operative map next.
- Signature verification completion records, district by districtNeeded: Required threshold, verified signatures, the date each district crossed threshold, the date final local verification returned, and the dates the Secretary received results.Why: Potentially the best evidence for how much of the late certification timeline involved actual signature verification versus constitutional and legal review.
- The November 25, 2025 federal hearing transcriptNeeded: Transcript from the Bluestone litigation, 4:25-cv-1535-ZMB.Why: Could document what Missouri and the Secretary represented to the federal court about constitutional-review authority, timing, expected procedure, the effect of rejecting the petition, and anticipated state judicial review.
- The December 8, 2025 order of dismissalNeeded: The order PDF from 4:25-cv-1535-ZMB.Why: The Missouri Supreme Court later relied on this history when discussing the Secretary's timing.